Is Apple Safari for Windows the best browser for the desktop?

In a previous post, I explored the JavaScript compatibility, on my laptop, of the 5 browsers I regularly use against the ECMA's test suite. That was my first attempt at the comparison, and I didn't think much of it. I undertook that exercise again a month later, yesterday, and I can say with confidence the following:

1. Chrome, Firefox and IE fare reasonably along the same lines.
2. Opera shows a lot of holes in its implementation
3. Safari is the worst performer: crashes in the middle of the test execution, probably due to memory leak.

You can see all the detailed results in a separate web page.

The Power of CSS (at the Open Web Camp, 2011).

If you are a novice to CSS, you will like this presentation by Estelle Weyl, which I attended yesterday at the Open Web Camp, 2011. If, on the other hand, you know a little of CSS, you'll love this presentation!

In this presentation, you can learn how to produce nice animation effects, such as producing snow any time you want! This use of CSS, as opposed to an equivalent JavaScript code, shows the power of declarative programming, in comparison with its companion, procedural programming.

A Comparison of Browsers: Popularity and JavaScript Compatibility

At the beginning of every month, new statistics are published on browser usage: At the onset of July 2011, as you can see from the diagram below, Chrome is closing in on Firefox, even as IE is losing its market share.

Source: StatCounter Global Stats - Browser Market Share

SVForum Cloud Services SIG: "The Future of the Data Center"

By the title of the meetup, namely "The Future of the Data Center", you might conclude that the two scheduled talks would be about how to architect future data centers, racks, power, cooling, etc. But, the talks were a bit more focused on only two, but important, aspects of enterprise clouds:

Brad Stone, Nexenta: Cloud Storage.

Dave Roberts, ServiceMesh: The Big Win.

Cloud Fabrics and Virtual Networks

In the last couple of years, nearly every networking equipment vendor is touting their new data center fabric aimed at the creation of clouds. Take a look at the [partial] list below, culled from the respective web sites:

Company	Fabric Offering
Arista Networks	????
Brocade Communication Systems, Inc.	Data Center Fabric
Cisco Systems	Unified Data Center Fabric
Extreme Networks	Open Fabric Data Center
Force10 Networks	Open Cloud Networking
HP	FlexFabric
IBM	BladeCenter
Juniper Networks	QFabric
NEC	????

At the Silicon Valley Cloud Computing Group: Zynga presents a Real World Case Study

If you believe cloud computing is still in its infancy, you have not learnt about Zynga. While Zynga have a hybrid cloud that powers their game servers involving their data center, a private cloud, zCloud, and a public cloud, namely Amazon Web Services (AWS), the more interesting fact is that they expect to be profitable in 2011 with a net margin of 35%, or a net profit of $630m on a $1.8B revenue.

At the Cloud and Virtualization SIG on Virtual Networks

This SDForum Cloud and Virtualization SIG meeting saw a set of very exciting set of presentations by vCider, Big Switch and Cisco. There have been mature commercial availability of CPU and storage clouds, but there have been no rich commercial offerings of [virtual] networks¹.

Virtual Networking and Clouds.

Recently, in a blog post written by Chris Marino, titled Virtual Networking, It’s Not Just a VLAN…, I came across a beautiful definition of what a virtual network is:

"A virtual network is a network you control that runs on top of another network that you don’t control."

Cloud Computing according to Yahoo!

In a presentation yesterday at Cloud Computing at Yahoo! Lessons, Challenges and Futures, Yahoo! Cloud Wrangler Geoff Arnold presented a view of how the Yahoo network needs to evolve in the present day cloud computing environment.
Although the actual extent of the present day Yahoo network could not be divulged for obvious reasons, Geoff argued that public cloud providers like Amazon Web Services (AWS) could not support the functionality that is expected of the Yahoo network. Even if the public network were to be made use of for a 24x7x365 production network, Yahoo would have to rent bare metal CPUs networked and storaged¹ together, and I do not know if the economics for such a deployment is already there. (We know, though, that Netflix uses AWS for streaming movies to its subscribers). This is probably true of other network based services such as Facebook's, Google's, etc.

Yahoo! Cloud Architectural Vision

The Yahoo! cloud architectural vision that was laid out — slide 31 on Slideshare.net — somewhat explains why general purpose public cloud services may not be sufficient: There seems to be substantial functionality that is somewhat Yahoo-specific that is not necessarily readily available in the public cloud. And, Geoff talked about "planet scale" for most of the functionality Yahoo delivers. In addition to the familiar layers of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS, that are probably richer than their run-of-the-mill counterparts, he also sees a Knowledge as a Service (KaaS) layer sandwiched between SaaS and PaaS.

Overall, you come away with the awesome feeling that the Yahoo network is really very big.

The video of the presentation is at the Silicon Valley Cloud Computing Group channel at Ustream.

---

¹We can regard this kind of journalistic license [of creating new verbs on the fly] as an advantage of the computer science profession.