In the last couple of years, nearly every networking equipment vendor is touting their new data center fabric aimed at the creation of clouds. Take a look at the [partial] list below, culled from the respective web sites:
Company | Fabric Offering |
Arista Networks | ???? |
Brocade Communication Systems, Inc. | Data Center Fabric |
Cisco Systems | Unified Data Center Fabric |
Extreme Networks | Open Fabric Data Center |
Force10 Networks | Open Cloud Networking |
HP | FlexFabric |
IBM | BladeCenter |
Juniper Networks | QFabric |
NEC | ???? |
Nearly all of them claim membership, in one form or the other, in the OpenFlow and the OpenStack community. So, how will a cloud provider pick from among these? Some of the obvious considerations are:
- Is the physical infrastructure capable of 5 9s1, or 99.999%, availability?
- How many virtual networks can be supported by the physical infrastructure? Or, more specifically, how many virtual links can be supported between any two geographical data centers? The economics for a cloud provider is related to this parameter.
It will be interesting to see how this physical infrastructure play will evolve.
1Actually, in order to provide the 5 9s behavior in virtual networks, it won't be a surprise if 6 9s availability is required at the physical network infrastructure level.
No comments:
Post a Comment